Did Lewis Hamilton's Silverstone Penalty fit the Crime?


By Jim K. July 22. 2021

Following the 2021 British Grand Prix, there was only one story in town – Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen finally making contact, and with it, creating enormous consequences for the Formula One championship. The two stars of the sport have battled hard throughout the season, with both performing overtakes in terrific wheel-to-wheel racing. It was only a matter of time before it all ended in tears.

Despite Hamilton being given a 10-second penalty, the Brit still took the win. His victory led to many onlookers questioning whether the stewards were too lenient, while, meanwhile others have suggested no investigation was necessary. It's a murky situation where you'll anger one camp of fans no matter your viewpoint. So, let's see which camp's wrath I will feel with my stance on the subject.

Before I delve too deep, I'll be upfront and say I'm British and cheered Hamilton on his way to that first championship in 2008. However, seven titles in, and I'm as desperate as anyone to see somebody else claim the crown of World Drivers' Champion. That could be Max Verstappen, Charles Leclerc, Lando Norris, Daniel Ricciardo, or anyone as I've turned into a true neutral where I'm only here to watch close racing. But I still want clean and fair racing, and if Hamilton takes title number eight on merit, I won't complain. Just give me a season of entertaining Sundays.

motorpsort

With those caveats drawn, my view is that the stewards made a mostly correct call here, but there is a deeper problem they cannot address during a race, but more on that later. The arguments thrown from the super-super Max fans to blessed #TeamLH supporters are too extreme for me to agree with either side. The bias each group has is evident, and I believe both sides would argue as strongly in the other direction should Hamilton and Verstappen's roles be reversed.

The Red Bull response was predictably over the top, particularly from Helmut Marko. Asking for black flags and race bans is as ridiculous as promoting a driver to Red Bull only to drop him one year later. Who would do such a thing...? Equally absurd are the suggestions that Hamilton tried to kill Verstappen with the move as if there was an element of malice involved. If the Mercedes steered left into the right-hand Copse corner at 200mph then, yes, I'd agree. Hamilton was undeniably over-ambitious, but that does not equate to homicidal hostility.

Those thoughts do not mean I believe that the defending champion is absolved of all blame, though. It is possible to overtake into Copse, as Hamilton proved later in that very same race. Yet doing so with a full tank of fuel on tires with only half a lap of heat through them is never going to end well. Not for the first time, we saw Lewis go a little manic in front of the Silverstone crowd. The Brit has a prior record in going more gung ho than usual in his home race to clinch a win. As such, and not for the first time, Hamilton had to mount a comeback after a first-lap British Grand Prix incident.

motorpsort

I believe the fault does not lie at Verstappen's feet, and the stewards penalized the right man. Verstappen isn't innocent, however. Some blame does need apportioning to the Dutchman, who knew Hamilton was inside his Red Bull. Max's reputation of not giving an inch is well-known, and despite shaking off the Crashstappen nickname with his ever-improving drives, he will always be an aggressive driver.

I've said before that Verstappen's patience is a problem, maybe the only problem he's yet to master, as we also saw in Turkey 2020. With a world championship on the line and sitting in the fastest car with a huge points advantage, picking battles to win the war would benefit Verstappen come the season's end. Even on a smaller scale, I suspect the pace Red Bull demonstrated in Saturday's Sprint would've seen Hamilton overtaken before long if Verstappen yielded the position. Instead, Max had a point-less Sunday.

Regarding the punishment in a 10-second penalty, I'm leaning towards slightly too lenient by the stewards. The problem motorsports have that many other sports don't is the inability to recompensate the losing party in a collision. The deep-rooted issue in F1 that the stewards cannot overcome is an inability to give an advantage back to the driver that loses out. Verstappen can't magically be assigned points he might've won; the stewards can only punish the other party. A messy overtake attempt, as Hamilton's was, is worthy of a penalty, yes. Going as extreme as a stop/go (the harshest short of disqualification) is too far. But given the Mercedes' speed, even a stop/go would still see Hamilton walk away with points and Verstappen not.

motorpsort

It's a quirk of how motorsports works, but I cannot think of any way to even the score for a driver who loses out. Unlike soccer, where a team gets an advantage if an opposing player is sent off the pitch, the driver in the tire barriers will remain out of the race. No matter the penalty applied on the 'attacker,' there's no coming back from the man on the sidelines. Had the stewards asked me, Hamilton should've had a drive-through. Yet even if Michael Masi had the good sense to call my number, the unfortunate result would always remain; Verstappen out of the race. A tough break for the flying Dutchman, but a mouthwateringly close championship fight is back on the cards for us neutrals.


MORE From FORTLOC


Travel

THE PENINSULA OF BILLIONAIRES

Museum

Lamborghini Museum

Timepiece

EDDIE GOZIKER INTERVIEW

Extreme E

Extreme E - All About the Planet

Travel

CÔTE D'AZUR CRUISE

Formula 1

The Modern F1 Car